I don't agree with dogfighting, but I believe people have a right to do what they will with their property.
July 30 2007
For all of you who didn't get the memo, I don't condone dogfighting, cockfighting, or any other kind of forced animal fighting. But I am a libertarian, so by definition, I believe that less government is better. That would naturally extend to animal rights laws. If an animal has the status of "property", it's the owner's rights to do with that property as they wish. The lamp example is not meant to discount the suffering capacity of animals, but to explain a similar scenario in which property can be misused in a similar moral infraction and our natural reaction. The government shouldn't legislate a particular brand of morality.
For anyone who strongly disagrees, I'd invite to go to youtube and watch "Meet Your Meat". Now, if PETA were in charge, what would the result be based on moral legislation?